I recently dug through some of my old files and found a paper I wrote during my first semester of college. The topic of the unidentified dead was a relatively new topic to me at the time, yet I still felt an immeasurable interest in their cases. Some of those listed in this essay have been identified since the course concluded in late 2014.
“Who are they?” A Question we should
Never Have to Ask
In
late 1979, Jane Doe is walking down a rural street in Caledonia, New York. She
sees a car approaching but looks away, thinking nothing of it. As the vehicle
reaches her, a loud noise rings out and a sharp pain explodes through her head.
Instantly, she falls to the pavement and is then dragged to the side of a field
and is shot once more. After the perpetrator is certain Jane is dead, he leaves
the scene, knowing that all evidence will be gone, as it will rain tonight.
Thirty-five years later, this victim is like the estimated forty thousand
unidentified decedents – deceased men, women and children that remain
unidentified, in the United States alone. A large number of such people range
from young children to teens, many of which were murdered. One of the largest
reasons such a problem exists is due to not enough being done to solve their
cases, including creating accurate reconstructions and gathering physical
information. Consequently, the vast majority of these cases have remained
unsolved, as usually both the child’s name and their murderer have gone
undiscovered for months, years or even decades.
A
frequent question that people ask is how a person’s identity could be unable to
be obtained. Many different factors are involved. Decomposition is the most
common case, where the remains of the decedent deteriorated until their bodies
were found. Depending on the weather, it may take merely days or months before
a person’s appearance is significantly changed. A girl’s body was discovered in
1980 in Anchorage, Alaska. The victim, aged sixteen to twenty-five, was
completely unrecognizable due to skeletonization (NamUs, 2012). Her murderer
has since been convicted, but the identity of the young woman, informally known
as “Eklutna Annie,” has eluded police for thirty-four years (Houston Chronicle, 2012). To put into
simplest terms, it’s easy enough to say that nobody could recognize someone if
the decedent’s features are reduced to decomposing tissue or bones.
Additionally,
a person to remain unidentified could be due to dying in a different state or
country. One young man, whose body was found in 1998 in New York, was found
with a book translating French into English, strongly pointing to the
possibility that he was an immigrant from a different country (National Center
for Missing and Exploited Children, 2012). This victim in particular was
skeletonized, like Eklutna Annie, and was murdered over a decade before (The
Doe Network, 2012). In this case, time also plays a factor, as those who knew
the victim might not be alive anymore. However, there are some cases where
decomposition has not distorted a person’s face, but they remain without an
identity.
Although
a victim may be found within minutes or hours after they die, their faces may
be unrecognizable due to the trauma that they endured. A girl whose body was
located in Yuma, Arizona in 1999 had been killed by a shotgun wound to her head
(The Doe Network, 2011). Such an instrument would inflict many individual
puncture wounds, which would be quick to disfigure one’s face, most definitely
reducing the chances of the victim being recognized.
The
most peculiar cases of unidentified decedents would be when the deceased
victims’ faces would be recognizable, yet the investigation would uncover
little or no clues about who they were. Such a case would be that of a young
woman discovered in 1979 in Georgetown, Texas, within a day after her death.
The victim had been strangled, which left little to no trauma to her face (The Paris News, 1998). The victim, known
as “Orange Socks” for the only articles of clothing she was found wearing, has
had drawings of her identifiable face released across the country to no avail.
More
cases remain unsolved due to the errors in the initial investigation. Vital,
distinct information used to identify decedents, such as DNA samples, dental
records and fingerprints are never taken. Another reason is because a facial
reconstruction (a drawing or a clay sculpture of the face) was never
professionally created. Those who would come across the case would most
definitely be unable to compare the victim to a missing person, due to lack of
information. In the case of an Illinois murder in 1977, the victim was found
recognizable but officials failed to examine his teeth and take his
fingerprints, a tremendous error to identify him (Betz, 2011). Many victims
today are identified through DNA analysis, as every person has a unique genetic
makeup. Because DNA comparison was not used until the 1990s, this information was
not possible to obtain (Jordan, 2007). Therefore, the potential of this victim
being identified is fairly small, unless his remains are exhumed, which can be
fairly expensive, as it may cost as much as $3,000 to dig the interred remains
from the ground (WJBK-TV, 2014). Because of this, investigation for individuals
who face similar circumstances is unnecessarily more expensive than it should
be.
The
process for investigating cases of unidentified individuals in general tends to
be very expensive. The cost of exhumation, DNA analysis, autopsies and facial
reconstructions are individually costly on their own. A recently developed
process is used by the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children
(NCMEC) to reconstruct skeletal remains that creates digital copies of
unidentified children’s bones and layering tissues over the computerized skull
to show an approximation of what they may have looked like when alive, with the
aid of CT scanners and photograph manipulating applications (Hicks, 2012). The
biggest problem with such a program is that it costs a large amount of money
but is extremely valuable because it is usually a reliable depiction of the
deceased (Gallucci, 2012). Especially for those who have undergone several
years without their identity, such a depiction is invaluable for solving the
case, as those who knew the decedent would be more likely to recognize them.
Facial
reconstructions pose a problem on their own. A basic form, where eyes would be
drawn over a photograph of the body, would be created for those who are not in
an advanced state of decomposition. However, according to NCMEC, a victim’s
mortuary photograph does not usually depict an accurate representation of a
person’s face, due to the natures of their deaths (WUSA9, 2014). As for the
victim found in Yuma, her face was retouched of the wounds she
received, but her features were still in an awkward position (NamUs, 2007). A
reconstruction released by the National Center for Missing and Exploited
Children was created with a more advanced method and arguably looks completely
different, as the artist made effort to show the victim with a natural facial
expression.
Another popular method used is reconstructing
the victim in 3D, created after layers of clay representing the tissues of the
face are added to a replica of the skull. The clay is spread to cover pegs of
various depth inserted into the skull, representing the depth of tissue for
someone of the age and race (Deem, 2008). An issue with these, as well as
sketches is that some inaccurately depict the depth of tissues from the skull,
resulting in an inaccurate shape of the subject’s face. Such an example is seen
in the case of a teenager or young adult from Washington had her face
reconstructed with both of these methods, but the artists responsible for two
of the three reconstructions failed to illustrate the victim’s obviously
square-shaped jaw. Therefore, these illustrated an inaccurate estimation of how
she appeared in life. A third reconstruction was created, this time
illustrating the correct shape of the face, but is of poor quality, as it makes
the victim appear to be much older than she actually was (NamUs, 2007; The Doe
Network, 2011). The fact that the victim may be depicted inaccurately can most
definitely cause issues with the investigation process.
This
problem on its own must be addressed, as police departments hiring forensic
artists should put much more emphasis on experience and adequate education
requirements for their employees. Opportunities for training exist in various
places, including seminars at NCMEC, which are provided to forensic artists
for free (National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, 2014). The
program used to reconstruct the Yuma victim was Adobe Photoshop, as there was
no need to create a CT scan of the skull, as this is not needed for those who
have been dead for a short period of time, although it is used in some cases to
make the CT reconstructions appear more like photographs, like one of Eklutna
Annie (Meincke, 2014; National Center for Missing and Exploited Children,
2012). If opportunities such as this were taken advantage of, there could be
much more lifelike and accurate reconstructions, as programs such as Adobe
Photoshop are considerably cheaper and are easily accessible, as this type of
program is well known in our society.
What
other establishments, including libraries, chambers of commerce and police stations
should do is to also have such posters available for the public to see. The
more exposure these cases receive, the better the chance of them being
identified, as they are more likely to be recognized if more people see them. A
way to bring attention to these unidentified children was in 2011 when NCMEC created a Facebook page dedicated to the cases unidentified in the United
States. Already, multiple leads have unearthed additional information with
several cases (WUSA9, 2014). To start a page on one of the world’s most popular
websites is a great start. The issue with this is that other things need to be
done to grab attention from those who do not use social networks such as
Facebook.
NCMEC uses one of the earliest methods to locate missing children, involving
placing posters in several stores, such as Walmart, which have many customers
per day. They have also created posters for unidentified children and young
adults that illustrate their estimated physical characteristics and the most
lifelike reconstructions available. However, although they are available
online, unidentified victims are not often displayed across a state, impairing
the need for awareness for unidentified victims. Nonetheless, at least a
hundred children were identified by 2007 after their computer generated faces
were released to the public (PR Newswire, 2007). With the new technology we
have today, we can likely increase the chances of an unidentified victim to be
returned to their family.
Although
efforts made by NCMEC have made tremendous progress, there is simply much
more that needs to be done. As mentioned before, methods of investigation are
expensive, as well as reconstructions. To solve such a problem, the public must
be made much more aware of this issue, most definitely increasing the chances
of more donations, which would result in more means to further efforts of
finding the true identities of these unfortunate victims. Some may state that
investigation toward identifying these people would be a waste of time, as some
have remained without their names for years, but for some, the answer would be
correct, such as for that of a Wisconsin victim found in 1921. The child’s
parents and his killer are more than likely deceased, which leaves no loved
one’s questions to be answered.
However,
some older cases are not hopeless. There have been numerous unidentified bodies
from the 1960s and before that have been identified in the past few years. Martha and Sandra Stiver’s bodies were
identified in July 2014, forty-six years after they were murdered, in 1968. An
individual came across their cases and submitted a tip to authorities, leading
to their bodies being exhumed and tested for DNA (Burdo, 2014). A second
notable case is that of Dorothy Gay Howard, whose lifeless corpse was found in
1954. It was not until 2009 when the victim’s DNA was compared to the
then-missing person and resulted in a positive match, giving her family some
sense of peace. There is also no need to pursue further investigation of the killer,
as the man presumed to have taken Dorothy’s life was convicted and has since
been put to death (Auge, 2009). If these cases weren’t enough, due to the
efforts from NCMEC, a boy who died in 1852 was identified using their
state-of-the-art reconstruction technique (Ruane, 2007). It is indeed clear
that cases that are fifty or so years old can be solved – as long as adequate
investigation is conducted.
Ultimately,
the fact that so many unidentified decedents remain without their identities needs
to be brought to the public’s attention, in turn, resulting in more funding,
leading to more means for further efforts to identify America’s unknown
children. By updating more policies, giving advanced training to forensic
artists to simply putting up a poster, more and more of these cases would
become increasingly solvable, putting to rest a missing person’s family’s
unanswered questions and providing closure to those who have become involved
with these cases.
Epilogue:
The Jane Doe introduced at the beginning of this essay was identified as sixteen-year-old Tammy Jo Alexander in January 2015. Tammy was a runaway from Brooksville, Florida.
The Yuma victim was identified as eighteen-year-old Angel McAllister in 2017. She lived in a foster family and left when she became an adult.
The Jane Doe introduced at the beginning of this essay was identified as sixteen-year-old Tammy Jo Alexander in January 2015. Tammy was a runaway from Brooksville, Florida.
The Yuma victim was identified as eighteen-year-old Angel McAllister in 2017. She lived in a foster family and left when she became an adult.
Works Cited
Auge,
Karen. "After 55 Years, Boulder Jane Doe's Story Finally Coming
Together." The Denver Post, 15 Nov. 2009. Web. 05 Nov. 2014.
Betz,
Dean. "Cold Cases: Forensic Expert's Project Could Resolve Decades-old
Deaths." Newswatch. Houston
Chronicle, 26 May 2011. Web. 05 Nov. 2014.
Burdo,
Allison. "46 Years Later, Missing Girl Case Solved." NBC 10 Philadelphia. NBC, 7 July 2014.
Web. 05 Nov. 2014.
Deem,
James M., PhD. "Featured Netherlands Mummy Museums: Drents Museum in
Assen: The Yde Girl, Reconstructed." James M. Deem's Mummy Tombs. N.p.,
2008. Web. 09 Oct. 2014.
<http://www.mummytombs.com/museums/nl.assen.drents.yde.reconstruct.htm>.
The
Doe Network. "Case File 195UFAZ." 2011. Web. 09 Oct. 2014.
<http://doenetwork.org/cases/195ufaz.html>.
"Case
File 218UMNY." Web. 09 Oct. 2014.
<http://www.doenetwork.org/cases/218umny.html>.
"Case
File 296UFWA." 17 Nov. 2011. Web. 09 Oct. 2014.
<http://doenetwork.org/cases/296ufwa.html>.
Gallucci,
Jaclyn. "Identifying Princess Doe: 30 Years After She Was Slain, New
Technology May ID Her and The Killer." LongIslandPress.com.
Long Island Press, 2 Aug. 2012. Web. 30 Oct. 2014.
<http://archive.longislandpress.com/2012/08/02/identifying-princess-doe/>.
Houston Chronicle. "'Eklutna Annie' Tells Tale
of Alaska Murder - Her Own."
McClatchy Newspapers. 21 July 2012. Web. 14 Oct. 2014.
Hicks,
Brad. "Unraveling the Jane Doe Mystery." FOX6Now. Fox News, 29 Feb. 2012. Web. 30 Oct. 2014.
<http://fox6now.com/2012/02/29/unraveling-the-jane-doe-mystery/>.
Jordan,
Michael, dir. "The Day the Music Died." Forensic Files. Prod. Vincent Sherry. HLN. Atlanta, Georgia, 14
Nov. 2007. Television.
Meincke,
Paul. "'Jane Gary Doe' Images Released in Gary Cold Case." ABC7 Chicago. American Broadcasting
Company, 3 July 2014. Web. 08 Dec. 2014.
<http://abc7chicago.com/news/jane-gary-doe-images-released-in-gary-cold-case/154419/>.
National
Center for Missing and Exploited Children, "JANE DOE 1980." Missingkids.com. N.p., 2012. Web. 08
Dec. 2014.
"JANE
DOE 1999." Missingkids.com. 2014. Web. 09 Oct. 2014.
<http://www.missingkids.com/poster/NCMU/1224544/1#poster>.
"JOHN DOE 1998." Missingkids.com.
2012. Web. 09 Oct. 2014.
<http://www.missingkids.com/poster/NCMU/1224544/1#poster>.
"Forensic
Imaging Training.” Missingkids.com, 2014. Web. 08 Dec. 2014. <"Forensic
Imaging Training." National Center for Missing and Exploited Children,
2014. Web. 08 Dec. 2014.
<http://www.missingkids.com/Training/ForensicImaging>.
<http://www.missingkids.com/poster/NCMU/1184520/1#poster>.
National
Missing and Unidentified Persons System. "NamUs UP # 489." NamUs, 30
June 2007. Web. 9 Oct. 2014. <https://identifyus.org/cases/489>.
"NamUs
UP # 4845." NamUs, 13 Feb. 2009. Web. 09 Oct. 2014. <https://identifyus.org/en/cases/4845>.
"NamUs
UP # 10217." NamUs, 1 May 2012. Web. 09 Oct. 2014.
<https://identifyus.org/en/cases/10217>.
The Paris News. "Unidentified Woman
1979." 17 June 1998. Web. 09 Oct.
2014.
<http://www.newspapers.com/image/13810955/?terms=orange+socks>.
PR Newswire. "Technology Used
by the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children Helps Put Face on
Child Who Died in 1852."Technology
Used by the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children Helps...
PR Newswire Association LLC, 2007. Web. 20 Nov. 2014.
<http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/technology-used-by-the-national-center-for-missing--exploited-children-helps-put-face-on-child-who-died-in-1852-58243332.html>
Ruane,
Michael E. "After Years Lost, Identity Reclaimed." Washington Post. The Washington Post, 20
Sept. 2007. Web. 20 Nov. 2014.
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/09/19/AR2007091902409.html>.
WJBK-TV.
"Bodies Exhumed at Plymouth Cemetery by Police for DNA Testing." My Fox Detroit. Fox News, 10 Nov. 2014.
Web. 20 Nov. 2014
WUSA9.
"Help ID Unknown, Dead Children on NCMEC Facebook Page." CBS
News. 18 Apr. 2014. Web. 30 Oct. 2014. <http://www.wusa9.com/story/news/local/dc/2014/04/18/missing-children-dead-unidentified-facebook-kids-help-id-me/7873953/>.